NY Times runs this "sob" story (I hate to even link to it) about how hard life is for all these poor people being impacted by high gas prices, how hard it makes there lifes blah blah blah bullshit. I am so damn sick about hearing about how hard high gas prices make peoples lifes, NPR does this shit too. Dammit, what about all the good things about high gas prices?! What about all these untold stories-
"When gas was cheap, I used to drive my car to work everyday, I was lazy and it was cheap. I felt bad about using my gas gussling truck and polluting, but not really that bad cause I'm not a hippie. But now that gas is so expensive, I started biking. It's great! I love my bike and am better shape as well as not spending money on my car or gas!"
Or...
"I love these high gas prices - everytime I'm driving around in my [insert hybrid model here] and those assholes cut me off with there [insert hummer/truck/gas gussling sports car here], I feel great knowing they pay so much fucking money for gas!"
Or...
"These high gas prices are working wonders for research and technology development, it's wonderful! There has been massive development in all sorts of new engine technologies, batteries, and tons of other shit that is really cool! Why didn't we tax gas to this level back in 1999 when gas was less then $1 per gallon, then 9/11/2001 would have never happened because we wouldn't be giving billions of dollars to corrupt regimes in the middle east! Oh, and we wouldn't have needed the Iraq war to boot, save [x] thousand lifes and [x] billion dollars there too! It wouldn't hurt that are air would be cleaner, and all those environmentalist could go back to worrying about the frogs instead of global warming!"
I am glad to see an article about how more people are using mass transit systems though (up 11.4% in Los Angeles in the first quarter of 2006), so at least some things are being reported.
Basically, the press seems to love to talk about gasoline demand as though it's inelastic and high gas prices make our lifes more difficult. I call bullshit. Complete fucking bullshit - it's not inelastic, and in fact if driving suffers from a tragety of the commons effects since... ok.. I'll stop now, bottom line is let's start recognizing all the positive impact of high gasoline prices and begin to celebrate high gas prices!
I've decided it. The next BBQ I'm having will be a "celebrate high gas prices" BBQ.
"When gas was cheap, I used to drive my car to work everyday, I was lazy and it was cheap. I felt bad about using my gas gussling truck and polluting, but not really that bad cause I'm not a hippie. But now that gas is so expensive, I started biking. It's great! I love my bike and am better shape as well as not spending money on my car or gas!"
Or...
"I love these high gas prices - everytime I'm driving around in my [insert hybrid model here] and those assholes cut me off with there [insert hummer/truck/gas gussling sports car here], I feel great knowing they pay so much fucking money for gas!"
Or...
"These high gas prices are working wonders for research and technology development, it's wonderful! There has been massive development in all sorts of new engine technologies, batteries, and tons of other shit that is really cool! Why didn't we tax gas to this level back in 1999 when gas was less then $1 per gallon, then 9/11/2001 would have never happened because we wouldn't be giving billions of dollars to corrupt regimes in the middle east! Oh, and we wouldn't have needed the Iraq war to boot, save [x] thousand lifes and [x] billion dollars there too! It wouldn't hurt that are air would be cleaner, and all those environmentalist could go back to worrying about the frogs instead of global warming!"
I am glad to see an article about how more people are using mass transit systems though (up 11.4% in Los Angeles in the first quarter of 2006), so at least some things are being reported.
Basically, the press seems to love to talk about gasoline demand as though it's inelastic and high gas prices make our lifes more difficult. I call bullshit. Complete fucking bullshit - it's not inelastic, and in fact if driving suffers from a tragety of the commons effects since... ok.. I'll stop now, bottom line is let's start recognizing all the positive impact of high gasoline prices and begin to celebrate high gas prices!
I've decided it. The next BBQ I'm having will be a "celebrate high gas prices" BBQ.
Visibility: Anyone
Found this on Digg today, quite humorous:
Sex in an MRI machine
"This wasn't easy. If any of you have seen an MRI tube, they tend to be small and cramped, difficult for claustrophobics to handle, and a tight enough squeeze for one person, let alone two. The methods section is the most interesting I've ever read." ... "Unfortunately, it sounds like action was hard to come by—while the ladies were willing, the guys seemed to have, umm, flopped. The researchers say the experiment was only possible thanks to the availability of a drug called sildenafil (aka Viagra), with one exception."
There are plenty of quotes not just synopsis. Read it and check out [I know you were wondering] the pics.
Sex in an MRI machine
"This wasn't easy. If any of you have seen an MRI tube, they tend to be small and cramped, difficult for claustrophobics to handle, and a tight enough squeeze for one person, let alone two. The methods section is the most interesting I've ever read." ... "Unfortunately, it sounds like action was hard to come by—while the ladies were willing, the guys seemed to have, umm, flopped. The researchers say the experiment was only possible thanks to the availability of a drug called sildenafil (aka Viagra), with one exception."
There are plenty of quotes not just synopsis. Read it and check out [I know you were wondering] the pics.
Visibility: Anyone
This is pretty funny, I saw it on Digg at this post today, called "Even Microsoft Designers Have Problem with IE"
StupidIEMarginHack and StupidIEWidthHackFrom this Microsoft website, host of various microsoft software, their CSS file starts with the following:
/* fix for the IE 1px-off margin error */
* html .StupidIEMarginHack
{
margin-right: 1px;
}
* html .StupidIEWidthHack
{
width: 100%;
}
...
Kevin, I'm guessing you can relate with this?
Visibility: Anyone
Hello folks! It is with great pleasure I introduce my Happy Hour Wiki (http://www.helpthehappy.com) for the Seattle area! I have copied a ton of entries over from another site already, so it is quite complete right now, but please look it over and add any pubs/restaurants that aren't included in your area.
Here's the goal - we need so many people viewing and editing the guide that my puny DSL line hosting the web site from my house croaks! So get your happy hour on, and get editing any mistakes/adding hot deals to the guide!
jet
Here's the goal - we need so many people viewing and editing the guide that my puny DSL line hosting the web site from my house croaks! So get your happy hour on, and get editing any mistakes/adding hot deals to the guide!
jet
Visibility: Anyone
I'm not sure this was a smart move on the Seahawks part. Maybe, but maybe Alexander just had the best year he'll ever have and we should've saved the money for the offensive line...
Seattle Times LInk
...$62.million contract that includes more than $15.million in guaranteed money during the first year of the deal...
Your opinion?
Seattle Times LInk
...$62.million contract that includes more than $15.million in guaranteed money during the first year of the deal...
Your opinion?
Visibility: Anyone


http://www.noendpress.com/caleb/biodiesel/
SVO or Straight Vegetable Oil seems to work without the requisite biodiesel processing. I like the idea of cruising to Costco and buying a few gallons of olives, peanut, and vegetable oil and then putting in my ride when the price of gas gets too high. Double ramen-booyah-back-at-cha
To the extent that people have the means to curb their gas consumption, they should certainly do so, and the potential rewards for their efforts will surely go beyond the immediate monetary savings (as you have noted). So if you live and work in a transit-friendly city, enjoy a flexible schedule, and you have a lax dress code, count yourself lucky and get your ass on the bus! However, many people cannot elect to use mass transit because they live or work in underserved areas.
Here’s my personal scenario: if I take the bus door to door from my house to my office, I have to take a total of three busses, my commute on the bus takes significantly more time than my drive would take, I risk missing transfers, I have to walk in my work clothes and shoes in areas without sidewalks, nasty weather (especially in winter) can be a problem, and the $4 per day 2-zone bus fare doesn’t seem like a great bargain compared with the cost for fueling my comfortable, dependable car. Still, I hate the traffic, and so (until recently), I have tried to leave my car on the West Side and take the bus across the lake a few times per week (still paying the $4 fare). The trouble is, I often work later than the latest bus service to my stop, and so my bus travel has declined. Just imagine how much more difficult it must be for those with young children that must be transported to and from daycare—bussing to work would be virtually impossible for them.
I also worry about the impact of gas prices on small businesses. As the cost of delivering goods and services increases, the prices for those goods and services should also increase, but small businesses risk losing customers to larger corporations that can ride out added expenses for a longer period of time. Delivery people and others who travel for business are also hurting—their employers are reluctant to increase their wages and mileage reimbursements, even though the take-home pay for these good folks is significantly diminished as a result of the current gas prices.
It would help if gas prices per gallon would correlate more closely to consumption. Instead of everyone paying the same price per gallon, those who consume more than the average consumer should pay a graduated surcharge; the price for someone who uses less than the average consumer would reflect a graduated discount. The data could be tracked at the pump by VIN, and rates would be tailored accordingly. This would provide a more immediate incentive for conservation than tax-breaks on hybrid cars, and it would create a more accurate picture of an individual’s impact on the market.
The saddest part of all this is that those who are the most likely to over-consume our resources (thereby driving up prices) are not going to change their habits any time soon. The person who drives an Escalade doesn’t care if gas costs $2 or $4—he might do a little grumbling, but he isn’t going to drive a smaller, more efficient car—at least not voluntarily. We need some tough new efficiency standards to prevent car makers from creating these monsters, and we also need to take a look at the inefficient use of fossil fuels in agriculture.
I can report one great thing about high gas prices—NPR has discovered something to talk about besides bird flu and global warming—not that these aren’t all important issues, but I don’t need a 10-minute feature every day on each topic.
Okay, I’ve had my say. Am I still invited to the BBQ?
http://money.cnn.com/pf/features/lists/global_gasprices/
maybe we don't have such "high" gas prices after all....
those biodiesel cars seem pretty cool... but isn't veggie oil kinda expensive?! (how much is it per gallon anyway.....?)
I agree with Jetpeach on this one. High gas prices encourage conservation and might actually do a better job in the long term of weaning America off its addiction to oil--better than politicians spewing forth some bullshit ass-covering doublespeak, with its attendant media spin and sound-byte marketing.
My solution? Nuclear powered cars. So the next time some arrogant prick with way too much money pulls up next to you with his overpriced, fuel-inefficient car, and talks about what sort of engine he's packing under the hood, you can simply say, "Oh yeah? I've got a fucking NUCLEAR REACTOR in MY car. I can harness the power of the atom for my own convenience. What now, bitch??!!!"
In Cincinnati, it's drive, or take the bus system which is basically there for show. You either drive to work, or you don't work. That's life. Even the Seattle bus system isn't that good. Microsoft people take it because they built a major transit stop on the main campus, and they give all the employees bus passes. Seattle is very much a car town. If the city was serious about transit, there would have been a surface rails system years ago.
I take public transit 90% of the time to my office, but it's as much to do with not wanting to drive for my commute. Sure, I save money (not all that much), but it's more about not having to deal with other people in cars. (plus I like havig time to play my DS lite)
And Deborah's right about the worst offenders not really changing their habits. If you have to really worry about the price of gas you put in the car, you can't afford the car. So if you can afford to have the Hummer, Escalade, sports car, the price of gas isn't going to change much. Most likely it was 2.60 when they bought the car. The extra 5 bucks at fill up probably isn't going to change anything.
as for deborah's arguments, my counter arguments are:
paragraph 1) if you're city/area isn't mass transit friendly, it's because demand hasn't been there in past and generally enough interest isn't there from the people. and it won't be any time soon, _unless_ gas prices are/stay high. i see it as unrealistic to think good transit systems would get in place untill people really really want them - bad traffic isn't enough to make most people want it bad enough, since cars are pretty confortable to sit in and people have demonstrated they are willing to commute in cars for hours. basically, those underserved area's are underserved because of low gas prices and the only way to change that is to make temporary sacrafices that will eventually lead to a better system in general. yes, it will take time, the entire structure and layout of cities/where people choose to live/etc is influenced by the price of gas, so it can't happen overnight, so I would agree if gas prices shot to say $7 a gallon, I think the impact could be sudden and hard enough that we might not be able to adapt fast enough and people would get hit hard. but even $5 a gallon would only help to evoke change more rapidly and could be sustained, especially if a portion of that money was a tax being funnelled back into helping with the transitions.
for your personal situation: in addition to the above reasons (hopefully your situation will improve), it's not as though some people driving is devastating - even at $20/gallon we would likely see a number of people driving around. but everyone would highly consider the fuel efficiency of their cars before purchasing, and would search for and support mass transit solutions... but ultimately, yes, some sacrafices will be necessary to improve the overall situation, and while that sucks for some more than others, lets take pride in making these sacrafices rather than complaining.
for small businesses, every time the price of a utility/expense goes up do we need to protect them? and if so, how, when and where do we draw the line? added bureaucracy to somehow protect small business would likely backfire. plus, what about the fact that small businesses can adapt faster? how about the fact that tons of people, instead of driving 30 miles to wal-mart, will instead go to that local small business near by? arguable, cheap gas is the #1 reason small business _don't_ compete as well against there large counterparts! i say, let supply and demand settle this, and lets enforce the legislation we already do have that needs to be enforced against big businesses (i.e. wal-mart employees should be allowed to unionize.) also, there is no reason supply and demand should not settle how much delivery drivers are paid/reimbursed, and this applies to big business as well.
this next idea of pricing differential sounds very flawed. great in principle, but too many loopholes and too complex/expensive to implement. ultimately, if we need to help the more unfortunate because they are suffering without less money, let's help them with education grants, and tax credits/discounts or something. or how about making mass transit free, paid for by gas taxes?
as for those who will still will drive their monsters, that is why gas taxes are essential to cover the negative externalities of fuel consumption, since these are not reflected in the price part. but fuel efficiency standards seem to work as well, though I would still rather see the marketplace encourage these standards by taxing gasoline more (e.g. i think virtually no fuel efficiency standards, but a heavy gas tax such that car buyers wouldn't want to buy a car without good fuel efficiency might work better, though i'm not sure about the full implications of this...). With the proper taxes in place, the Escalade driver pays a heck of a lot more in tax for driving, and this money can be used to improve mass transit systems. I prefer the market place (through a tax) rather than legislation because legislation gets out of date, has loopholes, gets changed for the worse, and often targets the wrong people (who knows, maybe there is somebody with a good reason to drive an Escalade. ... ok, maybe not).
Anyway, we'll see you at the BBQ for sure!
jet
Ooh, and here in Boston, the MBTA (the Mass tranist people) are raising our rates. Awesome!
Back in Boston I was filling up my gas tank once a week and spending $100 in tolls a month (commuting 34 miles each way... and grateful my 12 year old car got almost 30mpg). It would have been $1.25 each way on the subway to the commuter rail station, plus another $4-$5 each way for the train, + whatever fare it took to get from the rail station to my old job, + an additional hour of commute time per day otherwise. Or I could drive. Or move to the middle of nowhere MA. At least I had the financially ability to make the work/lifestyle choice. But if you consider what the average income in the US is (and what if that income needs to support dependents?)... most people don't have that luxury. No real point here, but I guess part of the issue is how to get people to adapt to alternative forms of transportation in a way that doesn't heavily impact their lifestyle preferences or requirements...
1) auto industry - government built roads, wars for oil, residential and commericial zoning plans, america's high project. Basicalloy, I'm told to live in dependency of gas.
2) farming
3) timber
The girl from Brandeis sounds so pathetic. I could understand hearing it from really poor neighborhoods where mass transit is non-existant, but this is just dumb.